{"id":331,"date":"2021-08-13T19:03:59","date_gmt":"2021-08-13T19:03:59","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/orgvision.io\/blog\/?p=331"},"modified":"2021-08-13T19:03:59","modified_gmt":"2021-08-13T19:03:59","slug":"measuring-employee-satisfaction","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/orgvision.io\/blog\/measuring-employee-satisfaction\/","title":{"rendered":"Measuring Employee Satisfaction"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Every organization would like all of their workforce to be happy and satisfied employees, but<br \/>\nonly a few succeed in transforming this dream into reality. A <a href=\"https:\/\/careervision.org\/job-satisfaction-statistics\/\">study <\/a>on job satisfaction reveals<br \/>\nthat only 40% of employees in America are usually satisfied with their job.<br \/>\nIn this post, we are going to review some of the key influences and impact Employee<br \/>\nSatisfaction numbers can make.<\/p>\n<h3>What is Employee Satisfaction?<\/h3>\n<p>What makes Employee satisfaction somewhat challenging is that every one of us is built<br \/>\ndifferently &#8211; humans fortunately are not like robots in that no two of us are alike. What<br \/>\nsatisfies one person may not satisfy the other. As a result there is rarely a universal program<br \/>\nthat can effectively cover all employees. Employee satisfaction programs should be localized<br \/>\nand flexible enough to incorporate the nuances of the individual. An example is work area<br \/>\npreference &#8211; some employees may prefer to work at a home office &#8211; others may prefer the<br \/>\noffice environment.<br \/>\nForcing everyone to work at the home office is going to benefit one group who will likely be<br \/>\nhighly satisfied and disenfranchise another group who will likely be very unsatisfied. And<br \/>\nevaluating the Employee Satisfaction score on an aggregate level would generate a<br \/>\ncompletely inaccurate impression of the workforce since one half are happy and the other<br \/>\nare not. The mean being average or satisfied &#8211; not one worker in that company is satisfied &#8211;<br \/>\nsome are very satisfied and others are very unsatisfied.<br \/>\nIn summary there are two moving dimensions to programs that drive higher levels of job<br \/>\nsatisfaction. Keep the human element in mind &#8211; as long as the preferences of your<br \/>\nemployees are understood this is a key driver for higher levels of productivity and<br \/>\nsatisfaction. Second, understand how you are measuring and interpreting the metrics.<br \/>\nNumbers can be completely meaningless unless carefully aligned with the preferences of the<br \/>\nemployees.<\/p>\n<h3>Positive employee satisfaction numbers do way more than generate happy employees<\/h3>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Enhanced Brand Image<\/strong><br \/>\nIf dissatisfied employees are working for you, they\u2019ll hurt your company\u2019s culture and turn<br \/>\nthe work environment negative. In short, dissatisfied employees affect the brand image of a<br \/>\ncompany.<br \/>\nBut, measuring employee satisfaction regularly (monthly or bi-monthly) and acting to<br \/>\nincrease the number of satisfied employees makes your company a workplace where<br \/>\nemployees are valued. This enhanced brand image attracts high-calibre employees, which is<br \/>\neventually positive for your company.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Reduced Turnover<\/strong><br \/>\nAccording to the dictionary definition of turnover, it is \u201cthe rate at which employees leave a<br \/>\nworkforce and are replaced.\u201d In today\u2019s time, it is almost impossible to retain employees if<br \/>\nthey don\u2019t feel happy and valued working in your company.<br \/>\nOn the other hand, satisfied employees are usually content and don\u2019t leave their job without<br \/>\nany valid reason. If you measure the satisfaction level of your employees regularly and take<br \/>\nsteps to improve it, you\u2019d see reduced turnover in your company.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Increased Productivity<\/strong><br \/>\nIt is well-known that efforts made by dissatisfied employees are comparatively less than the<br \/>\nefforts made by their satisfied co-workers. Less productive employees are not advantageous<br \/>\nfor any company.<br \/>\nWhen it comes to productivity, satisfied employees are usually 2X productive in comparison<br \/>\nto their dissatisfied peers. And, the easiest way to increase satisfied employees at a<br \/>\nworkplace is to measure employee satisfaction regularly and act to improve it.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3>How to Measure Employee Satisfaction?<\/h3>\n<p>There are many ways to measure employee satisfaction accurately. Employee Surveys are by<br \/>\nfar the most popular and effective at gaining a quantitative view of the your employee<br \/>\npopulation.<\/p>\n<h4>Surveys<\/h4>\n<p>Conducting employee satisfaction surveys is one of the most reliable methods to find the<br \/>\nlikes and dislikes of employees. Surveys can be anonymous which helps drive honesty in the<br \/>\nfeedback. Companies can do annual, semi annual or even quarterly surveys.<br \/>\nPulse surveys help you determine the progress in programs in addressing some of the<br \/>\ncompany&#8217;s weaknesses as pointed out by the employees. With Pulse Surveys you can<br \/>\nestablish a baseline and then ongoing you can determine how the company is doing versus<br \/>\nthe initial baseline that was established.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Every organization would like all of their workforce to be happy and satisfied employees, but only<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":332,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-331","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-blog","generate-columns","tablet-grid-50","mobile-grid-100","grid-parent","grid-33"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/orgvision.io\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/331","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/orgvision.io\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/orgvision.io\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/orgvision.io\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/orgvision.io\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=331"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/orgvision.io\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/331\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":333,"href":"https:\/\/orgvision.io\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/331\/revisions\/333"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/orgvision.io\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/332"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/orgvision.io\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=331"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/orgvision.io\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=331"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/orgvision.io\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=331"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}